Item
Vaccine Localism Defines Who Belongs
Media
Title (Dublin Core)
Vaccine Localism Defines Who Belongs
Disclaimer (Dublin Core)
DISCLAIMER: This item may have been submitted in response to a school assignment. See Linked Data.
Description (Dublin Core)
This article says the NH state government has changed its policy to define NH residents for vaccine purposes as NOT including second home owners, non-resident landlords, and other non-full-time residents. This matches policy in Vermont and Maine, both of which have cited vaccine scarcity as a reason to prioritize their own full-time residents (and presumably voters). Who "belongs" has been a hot question in New Hampshire since long before the Coronavirus emerged, but Covid-19 has emphasized existing fault lines. Lots of people with second homes moved more full-time to New Hampshire starting in March 2020, escaping areas with higher infection rates but being perceived as virus vectors by locals, particularly in areas that usually only see tourists in the summer. Vaccine scarcity has created an us against them mentality. NH is prioritizing those most at risk of death - which means those in nursing homes and congregate care facilities (did anyone know that word prior to coronavirus?) and first responders, but in the state with the 4th largest elderly population, that leaves a lot of people over 65 and living at home as second in line. The Governor had already put ski patrol in the list of first responders (so ski areas could open), so letting second home owners get vaccinated seemed to again prioritize those with more money over those more at risk. Little of any of this affects me directly - I'm already in a lower vaccine category due to being younger and healthier than the state average. But in a state where 21 years residence still marks you as an outsider since your family is not from NH, the increased "localism" feels potentially dangerous. While prioritizing full-time residents make sense to me, what will be the next line drawn and will I be okay with that one? How do existing biases in NH affect our vision of "who belongs"?
News article from New Hampshire Public Radio
Date (Dublin Core)
January 25, 2021
Creator (Dublin Core)
Todd Bookman
Contributor (Dublin Core)
Beth Salerno
Event Identifier (Dublin Core)
HI363
Partner (Dublin Core)
Saint Anselm College
Type (Dublin Core)
News article
Link (Bibliographic Ontology)
Publisher (Dublin Core)
nhpr.org
Controlled Vocabulary (Dublin Core)
English
Emotion
English
Government State
English
Health & Wellness
Curator's Tags (Omeka Classic)
COVID-19
vaccine
healthcare
Maine
Vermont
Contributor's Tags (a true folksonomy) (Friend of a Friend)
New Hampshire
vaccine
competition
scarcity
fear
HI363
Collection (Dublin Core)
Vaccine Stories
Linked Data (Dublin Core)
Date Submitted (Dublin Core)
01/26/2021
Date Modified (Dublin Core)
01/26/2021
01/31/2021
08/12/2021
09/24/2021
Date Created (Dublin Core)
01/25/2021
Item sets
This item was submitted on January 26, 2021 by Beth Salerno using the form “Share Your Story” on the site “A Journal of the Plague Year”: https://covid-19archive.org/s/archive
Click here to view the collected data.